1
KEAR family
research
Introduction.
My wife, Elaine, is a
KEAR. She is descended from the KEARs of the Forest of Dean.
All of Elaine's ancestors were born, and lived and died in the
Forest, up to the late 19th century when her great
grand-father, ELIJAH THORNTON KEAR ( 22 August 1867, Little
Dean, Forest of Dean ) left his village and moved to Castleford
in West Yorkshire. Elijah worked in the coal mines of
Castleford. Mining is in the KEAR blood and Elijah was carrying
on the centuries old traditional KEAR occupation. Elaines'
brother, Warrick Kear, has researched their ancestry to the year
1540, to a GEORGE KERE, a brother of 'Yeoman' EDWARD KERE of the
'Bream Line' of Forest KEARs. Warrick used parish registers and
statutory records and avoided anecdotal evidence, and thus
relied on scholarship to prove family connections. Anyone who
has pursued family history is aware of the problem with
anecdotal evidence. It is problematic because it is offered by
persons who prefer history as they want it to be rather than
history as it is. My own view, has, and always has been that a
proposed family history or pedigree be chronologically stable,
both standing alone and when integrated with every family said
to be connected by marriage. Ancient pedigrees are not proof of
anyone's descent, and, when the burden of proof falls on me, the
least I can provide is a pedigree that is chronologically stable
and does not contradict the evidence from known grants, deeds,
jury service and might be an accurate compilation.
My contribution to
research concerning the ancient origin of the surname 'KEAR'
comes on the coat – tails of the extensive research of Doctor
David Kear ( NZ ), Barbara Owen ( UK ) and Averil Kear ( UK ).
The pages that I have put together must be regarded as a brief
precis of their extensive research and Kear family researchers
should turn to the published research of the aforementioned
scholars. The findings of their research can be found in the
following publications; Barbara Owen's, James Kear of
Cinderford and his forbears the KEARS of The
Forest Of Dean ( Owen 1989 ); Doctor David Kear,
Forest Of Dean KEAR Families – Ancestry and Descendants
( Kear 2002 ) ; The Forest Of Dean KEARs – An Iron Age
Family ( 'The New Regard' The Journal Of The Forest Of
Dean Local History Society, Number 20, 2005 ), and
Extracts From Forest Of Dean 'KEAR' Families Ancestry and
Descendants ( May 2006 & December 2006 ). A copy of
Doctor David Kear's monumental Forest Of Dean KEAR
Families – Ancestry and Descendants ( Kear 2002 ), has
been deposited with the Gloucestershire Record Office. Doctor
Kear has produced a resource that ' aims to show the family
relationships of all the 4,000 or so known individuals, named 'Kear'
at birth or by marriage, who were born before 1900. Doctor
Kear goes on to explain his research, 'It places over
95% of those who lived in the Forest Of Dean, and some 70%
worldwide, into 100 or so 'Limbs' which together comprise the
total Kear Family Tree. It also includes a 108-page index
giving the birth, marriage and / or deaths details of each of
those individuals. Although Kear's now live throughout Britain,
the United States, Australia, New Zealand etc, virtually all
have known or suspected roots back to the Forest Of Dean'.
The initial research into the origin of the KEAR surname as
recorded in the Forest Of Dean, was the idea of Doctor Kear's
father, Harold Kear, who suggested that there might be an
ancient root to the 'Kear' surname. Doctor David Kear explains
' The basic research has been a family affair. It was begun
by our father in the 1920s, and expanded during World War II
through his collaboration with Bob Kear, his second cousin. The
work was continued by my sister Barbara Owen, and then by
myself, with valuable help from my son Philip Kear and many
others worldwide. By far the most important among the latter
has been Averil Kear of the Forest Of Dean Local History
Society, and lately of the Gloucestershire Record Office.
The primary sources for KEAR was church registers, deeds,
wills and census returns deposited at the Gloucestershire Record
Office and the Gloucestershire Collection at the City Library.
Barbara Owen comments on the problematic nature of the sources,
'Some items are tantalisingly brief and establish only a date
and a name, and if lucky a place....' ( Owen 1989 ).
Doctor Kear adds, 'The research involved all the sources,
pitfalls, frustrations, triumphs, and skeletons, so familiar to
all family historians' .( Kear 2005 ). After years of
research by using all available sources available to the family
historian it seemed the KEAR surname research would never be
progressed farther than the year 1565/6 when Edward Kear married
Johanna White. Doctor Kear makes this comment regarding the
entry for Edward's marriage in the parish register,'
The marriage record 'miraculously escaped the rodent attack by
about a quarter of an inch. His table tomb was the second
oldest, by a few months, of those still standing, in Newland
Churchyard at the time of Bigland's survey ( 1792 ). Its
inscription is still legible, recording his death as on 26
February 1613. That Edward was a yeoman ( landowner )
born about 1540 at the time of Henry VIII. Both Edward, and one
of his sons, held the important mining position of Deputy
Gaveller, the official who was essentially responsible for the
effective running of the Forest's important mining industry in
those days. The period before 'Yeoman Edward', and more
particularly before parish records, demanded a new approach.
Wills and other legal documents, particularly regarding land
transfers, provided most of the input, but the methodology
became one of a logical approach which attempted to squeeze
every drop of knowledge from every scrap of data',( Kear
2005 ). The 'logical approach' is a method of research I will
return to when I present my argument concerning the Welsh
ancestry of the KEAR folk. The question for Doctor Kear and
Barbara was 'what evidence is there for earlier KEAR presence in
the Forest?' It was Barbara Owen who proved instrumental in
furthering the KEAR research to an earlier time in the lives of
the inhabitants of the Forest Of Dean. Barbara came across an
entry in Cyril Hart's, The Regard of the Forest of Dene in
1282. Translation, Comments and Notes. ( 1987 ). In that
publication, an Adam de Keyrlun is stated to having operated for
two years ( in 1282 ) one of eight forges in the Staunton
Bailiwick.
Was it possible that
the Adam de Keyrlun referenced in Hart, who dates that
individual to c1235 AD, ( 1987 ) was the progenitur of the
Kears of the Forest of
Dean? Let's remind ourselves of Harold Kear's initial idea
concerning the origin of the KEAR surname. Barbara Owen writes
that it was her father, Harold Kear, who 'had an idea that
the name ( KEAR )is a corruption of the Welsh 'CAER', and that
the first people to whom it was attached acquired it because
they lived at a place called the caer or castle ( or KAIR or
some other corruption )'.( Owen 1989 ). All of the
consequent KEAR surname research following Harold Kear's initial
idea was underpinned by the desire to to show that the KEARs of
the Forest Of Dean, and its environs, were of Welsh extract and
connected to a place-name prefixed 'Caer'. Research to date
lends credence to Harold Kear's initial idea of the 1920s. We
are now in a position where we can assume that most, almost all,
Forest of Dean KEARs were descended from Adam de Keyrlun (
c.1220 AD my date ), who presumably brought an iron-making
capability to the Forest from Caerleon in south Wales in the
thirteenth century. There is evidence showing an individual
named MORGAN de KARLIUN being granted Dymock Manor by King Henry
III after 1222, and died in 1246, ( Morgan de Caerleon born
c.1185 and alive in 1235 AD. His pedigree is cited in the
mediaeval manuscript 'ACHAU BRENHINOEDD A THYWYSOGION CYMRU' ).
At least two documents
show Morgan ap Howel's name as Morgan de Kerlyun, so there is no
doubt that it was he who was granted Dymock., ( Originalia Rolls
doc. E371 National Archives, Kew ). Morgan de Karliun's steward
is named Adam ap Iorwerth or Adam Gwent, ( c.1190 AD ), whose
father had been steward to Morgan's predecessor, suggesting a
close relationship between the families. This part of the
evidence for accepting that Adam de Keyrlun ( so close to the
spelling of Morgan de KERLYUN ) was the same person as Adam
Gwent's son Adam Fychan, who had land interests in the Tidenham
area. Although Bradney is silent as to a title for Adam Fychan,
I would think he was Lord of Beachley since his son, Sir John ap
Adam Fychan is styled 'Lord of Beachley and Beverston'. The
family of another of Adam Gwent's sons settled in the nearby
Woolaston area. It is not known where in the Staunton Bailiwick
was Adam de Keyrlun's forge, but that Bailiwick apparently
extended SE from the Coleford-Clearwell area of the Forest- ie
towards the Tidenham-Woolaston area. Several records exist of a
reeve of Alweredston ( Tidenham-Woolaston area ) in 1285-90
named 'Odo Kere'. 'Odo' is assumed to have been also a son of
Adam Gwent, his original name of de Keyrlun being contracted to
KERE as Adam's had been. He is accepted as a younger brother of
Adam, but it is not impossible that Odo was a further alias of
the one person already known as Adam Fychan or Adam de Keyrlun.
Note about the
meaning of the Welsh 'Fychan'.
The Welsh word 'Fychan'
actually means 'little' in the sense that a same- named child of
Adam Gwent would be 'little Adam' to distinguish him from his
father. Not in the sense of physical stature; a short man was
called 'Bach'. Fychan is pronounced VAW kun and came to be used
much like the English 'junior'. Many Welsh families adopted the
nickname as their surname, spelling it Vaughn or Vaughan. The
English smoothed its pronunciation to VAWN. There was a
nickname given which meant 'the younger' but it was Ieuanc.
Others named KYRIE
from the coastal area ( Tidenham ) and KAI(E)R from Pentyrch (
Cardiff area ), are all thought to have been descendants of yet
other sons of Adam Gwent. They were the only other early KEAR-like
names. Thus all known 'Forest of Dean KEARs' are assumed to
have descended from that Adam, who appears to have had
connections with iron-smelting in Caerleon judging by his Coat
of Arms of three pheons ( spearheads ) on a band. Adam de
Keyrlun ( alias Fychan and perhaps even Odo ) is considered as
their legendary Patriarch because he was the first of the early
family to have an association with the Forest of Dean, and is
more certainly the KEARs ancestor. His name 'KEYRLUN' was
shortened at both ends to 'KEYR', and thence evolved through 'KERE',
'KEERE', 'KEARE, and even 'CARE' to the modern 'KEAR'. Because
Adam de Keyrlun was the first with the name in the Forest he has
come to be considered the patriarch of all Forest of Dean 'Kears'.
Doctor Kear suggests that, 'any identification of earlier
individuals in the family is merely speculative, and at this
point ( the twelfth century ) Kear genealogy ( essentially about
individuals ) should perhaps be considered as concluded, (
although some might consider that Adam Gwent's father Iorwerth,
and his grandfather Caradog, born about 1120 AD, might be
permissible genealogical additions ).( Kear 2005 ).
It is at this point
that I turn to my argument concerning the ancestry of Adam
Gwent. My argument is based on Bradney's A History Of
Monmouthshire ( 1923, re-issued 1993 ); Kari Maund and
Wendy Davies et al and a 'logical approach' to my research. I
have seen no source other than Bradney's that gives the ancestry
of Adam Gwent., ( Bradney 1923, p 218 ).It is set out thus;
Adam Gwent's father as Iorwerth ap Caradog, steward to
Iorwerth ap Owen ( father of Howel, Lord of Carlleon ) ap Meurig
ap Pyll ap Briavel ap Caradog ap Rhiwallon. My dates for
the births of Adam Gwent's ancestors are thus,( starting with
the earliest recorded ancestor ); Rhiwallon ( c.965 AD, of
Penrhos, upper Gwent ); Caradog ( c.995 AD, of Penrhos,upper
Gwent ); Breichol ( c.1030 AD, of Penrhos, upper Gwent ); Pyll (
c.1060 AD, of Penrhos, upper Gwent ); Meurig (c.1090 AD, of
Penrhos, upper Gwent ); Caradog ( c.1125 of Penrhos, upper Gwent
); Iorwerth ( c. 1160 AD, of Penrhos, upper Gwent ); Adam Gwent
( c. 1190 AD of Caerleon, Gwent ). Adam Gwent's son, Adam
Fychan, (c.1220 ) and living in 1249 AD, had a son Sir John ap
Adam who ( p. 219 ) 'married Elizabeth, only child and heir
of John de Gournay, with whom he held a large estate comprising
the manors of Beverston and Beachley in Gloucestershire,
originally part of the estates of the Lords Berkeley'. Sir
John was summoned to Parliament in 1296 and died soon after 1310
with his son Thomas 'under age'. Sir John ap Adam, otherwise
known as Lord John ap Adam, was present at the Battle of
Falkirk, July 1298. I will return to Lord John ap Adam and the
record concerning his involvement in the battle of Falkirk July
1298.
Clearly they, ( Adam
Gwent's ancestry ), were of noble Cymry stock or else they
would not have been given daughters of the royal family in Gwent
as wives. I doubt the paternal manor of Penrhoscould have been
received as a grant for services to the Caerleon princes since
it was located inSkenfrith in upper Gwent. Thus my own belief
is that the ancestry of Adam Gwent originated in Penrhos in
upper Gwent and moved to Caerleon in the 12th
century. As previously stated, I find no sources other than
Bradney for the family of Adam Gwent, but, by a study of the
lands held by him and his descendants and of the marriages cited
for them I arrived at my conclusion, which is, Adam Gwent was
probably descended from a junior cadet of the ruling families in
Gwent and Glamorgan, all of whom I trace to Owain ap King Morgan
Hen. That Owain had three sons;
l
Hywel, born c.940 AD whose
eldest son Meurig, was the father of Cadwgan father of Ynyr. The
latter, born c.1030, ruled upper Gwent from Abergavenny when the
Norman knight Drew de Baladon came to conquer it. I suggest
Gwaethfoed ap Gwyn ( descended from the Powysian family of
Tegonwy ap Teon ) then ruled the area just east of Ynyr and was
seated at Monmouth. Rather than fighting for their lands, de
Baladon married one of his daughters to a son of Ynyr ( Ynyr Ddu
married Jois de Baladon ) and another recently widowed daughter
married Sir Gwyn ap Gwaethfoed,
l
Idwallon was the father of
Ithel Ddu whose grandson, Iestyn ap Gwrgan, ruled the portion
of Morgannwg west of Gwent,
l
Iestyn was the father of
Rhydderch ( d.1033 ) who ruled lower Gwent.
( note: Various
historians and mediaeval genealogists, anxious to glorify the
lineage of Rhodri Mawr, claimed this Iestyn was a son of Owain
ap Hywel Dda. But that Gwynedd/Deheubarth family never ruled
any of the old Silurian lands in southeast Wales ). Therefore,
I have tentatively attached Rhiwalllon ( c.965 AD ), ancestor of
Adam Gwent, as a younger son of Hywel ap Owain ap King Morgan
Hen. His manor in Penrhos, upper Gwent, seems to indicate a
connection to that branch of the family even though his
immediate ancestors are found in service to the Iestyn branch
seated at Caerleon. There is no single source for the families
that descended from Morgan Hen. Various charters in the Book of
LLan Dav mention Rhys and Cadwgan, sons of Meurig ap Hywel who
most scholars ( including Kari Maund ) identify as Hywel ap
Owain ap Morgan Hen. Many of the pedigrees concerning Iestyn ap
Gwrgan continue as'ap Ithel Ddu ap Idwallon ap Morgan Hen',
while others offer 'Gwrgan ap Ithel Ddu ap Owain ap Morgan
Hen'. Both versions are a full generation too short to
reach from a c.1040 AD Iestyn to a c.880 AD Morgan Hen. If you
assume each omitted a different ancestor, then 'Iestyn ap Gwrgan
ap Ithel Ddu ap Idwallon ap Owain ap Morgan Hen is a reasonable
construct. With that construct, it posits sons Hywel and
Idwallon for Owain ap Morgan Hen. While many sources follow the
family of Iestyn ap Gwrgan in the western part of Glamorgan,
virtually all of them start the 10th and 11thcentury
rulers in Gwent with Ynyr of c.1030 and Rhydderch ap Iestyn of
c.975. Knowing that the ancestors of Morgan Hen were primarily
Gwentian kings, I concluded that both Ynyr and Iestyn ( father
of Rhydderch ) must represent other branches of his family.
Since no sources identify the grandsons of Meurig ap Hywel (
only the sons ) Ynyr must have been such a grandson; he occurs
at the right time but whether his father was Cadwgan or Rhys is
merely a guess. I opted for Cadwgan as he seemed to be the
older of the three brothers based on mentions in the LLAN DAV
charters. Iestyn, father of Rhydderch occurs c.945 and he both
fits as a third son of Owain ap Morgan Hen and gives us three
such sons for the three main kingdoms in south-east Wales. My
opinion is that Penrhos was a part of the patrimony of Hywel ap
Owain ap Morgan Hen that went to the younger son, who I suggest
was Rhiwallon, who sits atop the pedigree of Adam Gwent. That
patrimony likely included more land in upper Gwent which, went
via gavelkind over the succeeding generations, left only Penrhos
to Iorwerth ap Caradog, the father of Adam, ( under the law of 'Gavelkind',
the youngest son was entitled to the residence of his father
irrespective of how the remainder of the father's land was
divided between his brothers ). Caradog may have held other
lands and had other sons, so it is at least possible that
Iorwerth was not the eldest son. We only know that Penrhos
eventually came to Adam Gwent and had once been held by his
grandfather, Caradog. Bradney described the property of 'Penrhos
Fwrdios', at the head of moorland, close to the Afon Lwyd (
River Lwyd ). He then gave the 'pedigree shewing descendants
of Adam Gwent in the male line', commencing with Adam's father
Iorwerth ap Caradoc, and wrote: 'In the thirteenth century
Penrhos was held by one Adam ap Iorwerth, generally referred to
as Adam Gwent, who was steward to Morgan ap Howel the last of
the Welsh princes at Caerlleon. In 1246 Adam obtained from King
Henry III a charter confirming lands he held from his father (
Iorwerth c.1160 AD ) and grandfather ( Caradoc c.1125 AD ), and
by gift from Morgan ap Howel, in Llefenedd, Caerlleon and
Edlogan' ( lands northwards from Carleon towards Usk, and
southwards towards the sea to the east of the river Usk ), (
Bradney 1923, re-issued 1993 ).
In reviewing the
sources for the marriage of the legitimate but unnamed daughter
of Adam Gwent,
I came across GRUFFUDD
AP HYWEL, ( Bradney Vol III, part 2, pp, 218-20 ). Bradney
shows PENRHOS going to this daughter and casts a pedigree on
page 220 saying she married GRONWY FYCHAN ap GRONWY ap RHIRYD
FLAIDD. He shows this marriage had only a single child,
JOAN, who married
GRUFFUDD TEW AP HYWEL descended from RHYS GOCH Lord of YSTRAD YW
in BRYCHEINIOG born c.1270 AD. The pedigree of the Williams
family of PENRHOS FWRDIOS is found in Bradney’s History of
Monmouthshire, Vol 3, part 2, p 220. It shows ADAM GWENT’S
unnamed daughter marrying GRONWY FYCHAN and their daughter, JOAN
marrying GRUFFUDD TEW. Their son, DAFYDD had a son named HYWEL
GAM and through him PENRHOS passed to THOMAS WILLIAMS. GRUFFUDD
TEW descended from RHYS GOCH of YSTRAD YW. The RHYS GOCH
family were from YSTRAD YW in BRYCHEINIOG and while next door to
upper Gwent, they never ruled anything there. GRUFFUDD TEWS
arms are ‘Argent, a dragon’s head erased vert, holding in the
mouth a sinister hand couped at the wrist proper’. It seems a
variation of those arms were adopted by the William’s family as
‘argent, 3 wyvern’s heads vert, in their mouth hands couped at
the wrist proper’. ( PAPWORTH’S ORDINARY, p 937 ). I have seen
no pedigrees which indicate that JOAN ferch GRONWY FYCHAN
remarried after GRUFFUDD TEW was hanged, nor that the couple had
a child other than DAFYDD who inherited PENRHOS.
CARADOG (c.995 AD) ap RHIWALLON ( c. 965
AD ) and VILLA GUNNUC in
GWARTHA CWMM.
Among the LLAN DAV
charters is one which Wendy Davies dates to 1075, but Kari Maund
believes may be as early as 1071. It was made by Caradog ap
Rhiwallon on his deathbed, supposedly to atone for his earlier
slaying of his brother, Cynan. The plot of land given to the
church at Llandaff is called VILLA GUNNUC in GWARTHA CWMM. Both
Wendy Davies and Melville Richards identify that as LLANGWM ISAF
in Usk in lower Gwent. Caradog ap Rhiwallon also appears in a
couple of earlier charters as a witness, but in that one Davies
dates to c.1045, he also grants lands to the church called
LLANPETYR in HENNRIU. This is said to be LLANBEDR – YN –
HENRHIW in the parish of LANGSTONE, commote of LLEBENYDD,hundred
of Caldicot. In the grant, Caradog describes himself as 'Comes'
of king Meurig. This would be Meurig ap Hywel ap Owain ap
Morgan Hen, king of upper Gwent. Recall that I ( without any
source authority ) made Rhiwallon, at the top of Adam Gwent's
pedigree, a brother of this Meurig. It thus seems quite
reasonable that a son of Meurig's younger brother would be a
soldier in his warband, and depending on how you define 'Comes',
perhaps even the leader of that warband. To me, this is more
evidence pointing to Adam Gwent having been descended from a
junior cadet of the ruling family in upper Gwent. I date his
ancestor, Caradog ap Rhiwallon, to c.995/1000 AD or in his 40s
when the charter was issued. This is also consistent with him
being onhis deathbed in the 1070s. The ancestors of Adam Gwent
probably held extensive lands in Gwentin the 11th
century, his inheritance of Penrhos only indicates how
'gavelkind' usually carved up large holdings to provide a piece
for each succeeding generation. While Kari Maund expresses her
doubts about it, that c.1045 charter claims the gift was to
atone for Caradog's part in the purported sin of King Meurig
against one of his men, Seisyll ap Gistlerth. Meurig had
confessed to violating the sanctuary of LLANDAFF to seize the
wife of that Seisyll, for which act he had been excommunicated.
Meurig sought pardon, restored the woman and gave the church
some land. The text of Caradog's grant indicates he abetted that
act as the 'Comes' of King Meurig.
Note regarding the
meaning of 'Comes'.
Doctor M L Bierbrier
in his piece New Developments In Medieval Genealogy gives
valuable insight into the meaning of 'Comes'. Bierbrier noticed
the use of the title 'Comes' in post Domesdaydocuments,
eg, 'Comes' of various locations, but occasionally the Comes
( Earl ) is found under his own name such as de Redvers, Comes.'
With Bierbrier's comments in mind I will render 'Caradog as
the 'Comes' of King Meurig' as 'Caradog the Earl of King
Meurig'.
( see Genealogists'
Magazine Journal of the Society of Genealogists, Volume 27
Number 10 June 2003 p,466 ).
ADAM GWENT ( c. 1190 AD ) and THE
LORDS OF CAERLEON
At this point in my
account of Adam Gwent's ancestry I will turn to the ruling
family in Caerleon in lower Gwent – the Lords of Caerleon. If
we follow the inheritance trail for Adam Gwent's children, it
will be clear that his mother was ALIS ferch SIR BLEDDYN
BROADSPEAR, Lord of LLANLLOWEL. Bradney references the ancestry
of Adam Gwent. Adam's ancestry appears as anappendage to the
history of the senior line in lower Gwent – the Lords of
Caerleon, and using Bradney as the source authority, Iorwerth
ap Caradog is the earliest of Adam Gwent's family known to have
lived in Caerleon. My opinion is Iorwerth ( c.1160 AD the
father of Adam Gwent ), moved to Caerleon, from Penrhos to marry
Alis ferch Bleddyn Broadspear and it would explain why Iorwerth
landed a high position at the court at Caerleon, depending on
which came first, his position or his marriage. A fresh analysis
of the inheritance trail makes it reasonable to presume that
Alis ferch Sir Bleddyn Broadspear is the mother of Adam Gwent. Alis
brought the manors of LLANLLOWEL and BEACHLEY to her husband (
and children ). You will find LLANLLOWELbeing inherited by
CYNHAETHWY a base son of Adam Gwent and BEACHLEY given to ADAM
FYCHAN, another base son. If both these sons were sired out of
wedlock, as Bradney claims, it seems much more likely that any
lands which had been the ancestral manors of Alis ferch
Bleddynwould have gone to her children.....not to sons of her
husband by a mistress. By making Alis the wife of Iorwerth ap
Caradog, then her son was ADAM GWENT and it makes sense he would
inherit his mother's lands and Adam's children received the
lands on marriage. As for Alis's father, BLEDDYN BROADSPEAR, I
have not seen a source that identifies his ancestry. It is my
belief he was a son of MORGAN ap OWAIN WAN of lower Gwent. This
was only arrived at because BLEDDYN'S lands were a part of the
territory known to have been ruled by the aforementioned
MORGAN. The LLYFR BAGLAN, 79, 215 and 323; DWNN I, 196, 292 and
312 all cite ALIS ferch BLEDDYN BROADSPEAR and most of those
that mention his lands call him Lord of LLANLLOWEL and BEACHLEY.
LLANLLOWEL ( or LLANLLYWEL ) was located in USK in lower Gwent,
the latter being the patrimonial lands given to Morgan ap Owain
Wan. By the time Adam Gwent died, he held his ancestral manor
of PENRHOS which he gave to his only legitimate daughter. But
he also held lands recently acquired from his mother and from
grants by the royal family of Caerleon which he served. It was
these estates which he settled on his out-of-
wedlock children when
they married.
Sir John ap Adam ap
Adam Fychan ap Adam Gwent
Bradney shows Adam
Gwent's son, Adam Fychan ( c.1220 ) living in 1249, had a son,
namely, Sir John ap Adam, ( P,219 ). I date his birth c.1255
AD. Sir John ap Adam was an enforcer for King Edward I and was
summoned to Parliament and to military service as a Baronet ( he
was required to bring men with him ) several times between 1297
and 1307. Sir John ap Adam Fychan is called John Abadam in a
1297 entry in Parliamentary Writs, p 292. A writ dated
30 March 1298 summoning him ( along with about 50 others ) to
attend the King in York with horses and arms on the feast of
Pentecost. The list of names is alphabetical and he is first as
JOHANNI ab ADAM, ( the item on John ap Adam summoned to York is
described in Printed Parliamentary Writs, Vol I, p310
). Further evidence for Sir John ap Adam can be found in
Writs of Parliament, Francis Palgrave Ed, Vol 2, published
1827. This volume contains 27 writs dated from 1297 to 1307
which name John ap Adam ( in various forms of his name). Most
are either summonses to Parliament or to perform military
service for the King. A writ dated 25th May 1298
appears in Vol I, pp, 310-11. The writ is in latin and is
addressed to 68 men including John ap Adam mandating them to
appear at York and to bring four men each, together with horses
and arms, for military service against the Scots. John ap Adam
appears 39th on the list which is not in alphabetical
order. The list that is in alphabetical order is the
ALPHABETICAL DIGEST OF PERSONS which begins on page 421. This
is an index showing dates, descriptions and page numbers where
each man is named. The first name in this list is AB ADAM or AP
ADAM, JOHN. There is an entry for Sir John ap Adam in The
Falkirk Roll of Arms, held in The British Museum. It is
described as 'Roll of Arms of the Commanders on the English side
at The Battle of Falkirk'. The arms he bore, as described in
Roll of Arms of Knights at Falkirk are also ascribed to BLEDDYN
BROADSPEARE, ( see PAPWORTH'S ORDINARY ARMS). Finally he is
mentioned in the Falkirk Roll of Arms asJOHAN DE BADHAM. This
has been translated into english and the full entry reads,
'John ap Adam Baron of Beverstone Sal. 1297. Summon to Parl.
1299. L. POPE 1301 ( letter to the POPE ),OB, C.1309. Argent
on a cross gules, 5 mullets or the mullets are sometimes
pierced'.A list of arms is included in 'Parliamentary Writs'
and on page 411 is SIRE JOHN DE BADDEHMfollowed by the same
arms.
It appears Sir John ap
Adam made a claim for a horse lost at battle. He is called
DNS Johannes de Badeham, ( The Roll of Horses – Exchequer QR
Army 26 Edward I22/20 ). Which proves it wasn't a total
disaster for the Scots, they did kill Sir John's horse!!
Bradney says Adam
Fychan received BEACHLEY from his father, and that land was held
by SirJohn ap Adam and his son, Thomas. Sir John John ap Adam
obtained BEVERSTON by his marriage to its heiress, ELIZABETH DE
GOURNAY. Another source says 'Elizabeth De Gournay carried the
BEVERSTON property to LORD JOHN AP ADAM in 1287', ( and )
'conveyed the manor of Barrow Gurney in marriage to Sir John Ap
Adam, Lord of Beverston'. There are two publications that give
precise year dates for the marriage of ELIZABETH DE GOURNAY to
SIR JOHN AP ADAM. The STRIGULENSIA gives the following
information about that marriage,'The heiress ( ELIZABETH
DE GOURNAY ) had been united to her husband, SIR JOHN AP
ADAM, before the death of her father, which took place in 19
EDWARD I......' By using EDWARD I reign, ( 1272-1307 ), as
a stable time line ELIZABETH DE GOURNAY married SIR JOHN AP ADAM
in 1291. Another source entitled COLLECTIONS FOR A PAROCHIAL
HISTORY OF BARROW GURNEY gives the following information
regarding their marriage,'ELIZABETH DE GOURNAY,who by her
marriage to SIR JOHN AP ADAM 19 Lord of Beverston and Kingweston,
when only sixteen years of age, carried Barrow to that
family...' That would makeELIZABETH DE GOURNAY'S birth date
1275. According to my guesstimate for SIR JOHN AP ADAM's birth
year ( c.1255 ), then he would have been 36 years old when he
married the 16 year old ELIZABETH DE GOURNAY. I estimate the
birth year for their child THOMAS AP ADAMas 1299, based on
report that he came of age in the 13 of EDWARD II reign, (
1307-1327 ).ELIZABETH's father, JOHN DE GOURNAY is reported to
have lived 1261 to 1291. That would mean JOHN DE GOURNAY was
aged 14 years when he fathered ELIZABETH. I find it
improbable, not impossible. In respect to age difference at
marriage, EDWARD I married ELEANOR when she was aged 13 and
himself aged 15, ( they married 1 November 1254 ).EDWARD's
second marriage was to MARGUERITE OF FRANCE when he was aged 60
and his bride was aged 17, ( they married 10 September 1299 ).
The ancestry of
Elaine Covington ( nee Kear )
Barbara Owen's research revealed a WILLIAM
KEERE of NEWLAND in 1366 ( Owen 1989 ).
Eventually, 'two
WILLIAM KEARS were identified both of whom were born around
1330-1335.It was discovered that one of those two WILLIAM KEARS
who lived near NEWLAND, had a son JOHN, who became the first of
a succession of six eldest sons named JOHN KEAR ( with various
spellings of the surname ). They were born between about 1365
and 1505. The youngest is thought to have been 'YEOMAN
EDWARD'S' father..........'For the period immediately before the
two WILLIAMs, data is scarce. However, one or other of the
WILLIAMs is assumed to have been either the son of GILBERT KYRIE
of LYDNEY ( born about 1300 ), or grandson of ROBERT KEERE of
TIDENHAM ( born about 1270 )( Kear 2005 ). If David Kear's
assumption regarding the descent of the WILLIAM KEAR grandson of
ROBERT KEERE of TIDENHAM is correct, then, a timeline to ADAM
GWENT of CAERLEON can be presented thus:
ADAM GWENT of CAERLEON ( c. 1185-90 AD )
( the father of )
ADAM
FYCHAN aka ADAM DE KEYRLUN ( c. 1220 AD )
( the father of two sons )
SIR JOHN AP ADAM FYCHAN (
c.1255 – 1310 AD )
ROBERT
KEERE of TIDENHAM ( c. 1260/70 )
According to Owen, 'the
earliest definite trace of the family name in Gloucestershire
occurs in 1306 when ROBERT KEERE was a free
tenant, holding 7 and half acres of land in the manor of
Tudenham ( now Tidenham ) for which he paid 2s.6d per annum to
the Lord of the manor, Roger le Bigod, Earl of Norfolk and
Suffolk...................the size of his holding suggests that
this Robert was engaged in some kind of husbandry'.( Owen
1989 ). David Kear says, 'Certainly, following the decline
of Caerleon, some of ( that ) ADAM GWENT's sons and grandsons
moved into the area along the northern bank of the Seven estuary
around Tidenham and Lydney – the area which is broadly
topographically below the Staunton Bailiwick.' ( 2005 ).
ROBERT KEERE
( c.1260/70 ) had an unknown son born c.1305. That unknown son
was father to WILLIAM KEERE ( c.1335 ),who married JOHANNE and
established the CHURCHEND, 'EDWARD' and BREAM TREES. WILLIAM
KEERE and JOHANNE, 'who lived near NEWLAND, had a son JOHN,
who became the first of a succession of six eldest sons named
JOHN KEAR ( with various spellings of the surname ). They were
born between about 1365 and 1505. The youngest is thought to
have been 'YEOMAN EDWARD'S' father.........' ( Kear 2005 ).
'YEOMAN EDWARD'S' younger brother was GEORGE KEAR ( KERE ), born
1549 who married ELIZABETH PARTRIDGE in the year 1573 in
NEWLAND. GEORGE was buried 20 June 1627, NEWLAND. GEORGE and
ELIZABETH's son HENRY KEAR ( KERE ) was baptized 14 April1576,
NEWLAND. HENRY'S son, JOHANES ( JOHN ) KEAR was born about
1603, NEWLAND AND MARRIED JOAN. Their son, JOHANES ( JOHN )
KEAR was born about 1631, NEWLAND. JOHANES' son JOHN KEAR born
1659, NEWLAND married MARIAM 24 October1683, NEWLAND. Their
son, JOHN KEAR, baptized 24 July 1695, NEWLAND married ELIZABETH
THOMAS 25 August 1723, NEWLAND. Their son WILLIAM KEAR,
baptized 1726, NEWLAND married ELEANOR in 1747 BREAM. Their son
ENOCH KEARE baptized 1771, BREAM, married HANNAH HAWKINS 29
November 1796, NEWLAND. Their son, ENOCH KEAR, baptized 14
September 1800, BREAM married MARY BALDWIN 21 August 1824 ST
BRIAVELS. Their son ELIJAH KEAR born 15 October 1837 WHITECROFT,
WEST DEAN married ANN PHILLIPS 25 December 1862, ST JOHN'S
CHURCH , RUSPEDGE, GLOUCESTERSHIRE. Their son ELIJAHTHORNTON
KEAR born 22 AUGUST 1867 LITTLE DEAN FOREST OF DEAN married
CLARA MASON 10 FEBRUARY 1889, PARISH CHURCH, CASTLEFORD,
YORKSHIRE. Their son HAROLD KEAR born 8 DECEMBER 1898,
CASTLEFORD, YORKSHIRE married DORIS SYKES 7 MAY 1921 CASTLEFORD,
YORKSHIRE. Their son HAROLD RENWICK KEAR born 3 JULY 1927
CASTLEFORD, YORKSHIRE is the father of ELAINE KEAR born 21
NOVEMBER 1952 CASTLEFORD YORKSHIRE.